European companies are increasingly reconsidering their business travel policies to the United States due to heightened concerns over border control measures and immigration policies. These changes, which have sparked uncertainty among employees and employers alike, reflect a growing worry about the challenges posed by stricter U.S. entry protocols.
Key Challenges for European Businesses
While most business travel to the U.S. remains unaffected, some firms, particularly those in politically sensitive industries, are taking extra precautions. Companies in fields such as engineering, accounting, and NGOs that produce investigative reports have noted an uptick in employee concerns. Reports of detentions, deportations, and aggressive questioning at U.S. borders have prompted businesses to adapt their travel strategies.
Some of the key measures being implemented include:
- Use of “clean” devices: Employees are being advised to travel with electronic devices wiped of previous communications to avoid scrutiny of sensitive information.
- Alternative travel routes: In some cases, companies are encouraging employees to enter the U.S. via Canada to minimize direct encounters with U.S. border control.
- Virtual participation in events: Attendance at U.S.-based conferences and meetings is increasingly being shifted online to avoid travel complications.
The Impact on Business Travel
Business travel is a significant contributor to the U.S. economy, generating $421 billion in revenue and $119 billion in tax contributions in 2022, according to the Global Business Travel Association (GBTA). However, with nearly 30% of global travel buyers expecting a decline in business travel volume in 2025 due to U.S. policies, the sector faces potential setbacks. The aviation industry, which heavily relies on business travelers for profitability, is particularly vulnerable.
Rising Concerns Over Border Policies
The Trump administration’s approach to border control and immigration has intensified scrutiny. Reports of tourists and even students being detained for extended periods have fueled international anxiety. Policies such as the “Catch and Revoke” rule, which allows U.S. authorities to revoke visas after a single violation of U.S. law, regardless of severity, have added to the unease.
For many European companies, these policies evoke comparisons to travel protocols typically reserved for trips to countries with autocratic regimes. Employees are now being prepared for scenarios involving aggressive questioning and surveillance.
Academic and NGO Perspectives
Academic institutions and non-government organizations (NGOs) have been particularly vocal about the challenges. Researchers and NGO employees have reported delays, detentions, and increased visa complications. Some organizations have instituted new travel protocols, such as requiring employees to use burner phones or laptops during trips and providing training on how to handle intensive questioning at the border.
One academic from Switzerland shared that their colleagues were advised to travel through Canada or attend conferences virtually to avoid potential issues. The head of an NGO highlighted the stark contrast between current U.S. travel protocols and past experiences: “The idea that we would have to apply travel protocols akin to those for autocratic regimes to the U.S. is something that would never have occurred to me until recently.”
A Climate of Uncertainty
The prevailing sentiment among businesses and individuals is one of unpredictability. While some firms worry about overreacting to isolated incidents, others believe it is necessary to take these measures seriously, given the current environment.
As the U.S. continues to implement stricter border control measures, the potential ripple effects on business travel, international collaboration, and economic ties between Europe and the U.S. remain significant. For now, many European companies are opting for caution, ensuring their employees are well-prepared for any challenges they may face when traveling to the United States.
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
