U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has reignited his controversial ambition to acquire Greenland, the world’s largest island, citing its critical resource potential as a strategic necessity for national security and global freedom. With his inauguration scheduled for January 20, Trump has escalated his rhetoric, labeling U.S. ownership of the autonomous Danish territory as “an absolute necessity.”
This renewed focus on Greenland has drawn global attention, sparking debates over critical minerals, geopolitical strategy, and climate change. Experts and political leaders alike are weighing in on what Trump’s fixation could mean for Greenland, the U.S., and the world.
The Strategic Importance of Critical Minerals
Greenland’s vast resource potential is a major driver behind Trump’s interest. According to Jakob Kløve Keiding, a senior consultant at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), the island holds significant reserves of critical raw materials, including rare earth metals like graphite, niobium, and tantalum, as well as titanium and platinum group metals.
“Overall, we can say that there is a huge potential for critical raw materials [in Greenland],” Keiding. Many of these minerals are crucial to green technologies, such as wind turbines, electric vehicles, and energy storage systems, as well as national security applications.
The urgency stems from the global energy transition and concerns over the supply chain dominance of China, which currently controls 60% of the world’s rare earth production. U.S. officials have called this a strategic challenge, underscoring the importance of diversifying resource sources.
Greenland’s Response: ‘Not for Sale’
Despite Trump’s aggressive pursuit, Greenland’s leadership has dismissed the idea of selling the territory. Prime Minister Mute Egede has reiterated that Greenland is “not for sale,” urging the international community to respect its aspirations for independence.
Aaja Chemnitz, a Greenlandic member of the Danish parliament, described Trump’s comments as “disrespectful” but emphasized the island’s openness to collaboration. “American investors are welcome,” Chemnitz said, highlighting opportunities in Greenland’s mining industry for rare earth extraction.
A Race for Resources and Independence
Roderick McIllree, executive director of U.K.-based mining company 80 Mile, described Greenland as the site of “a race for what’s left.” Independent surveys suggest the island could hold 20–25% of the planet’s remaining extractable resources, making it a hotbed for resource competition.
“If Greenland plays their cards right, this will lead to their independence,” McIllree said, pointing to the potential for economic growth through responsible resource development.
Geopolitical Tensions and Climate Change
Greenland’s resource wealth is closely tied to broader geopolitical and environmental discussions. Melting ice due to climate change is making Greenland’s mineral reserves more accessible, further intensifying global interest.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, during a visit to Nuuk in 2024, inaugurated an EU office to strengthen Europe’s presence in Greenland. The move came with €94 million in cooperative agreements to invest in clean energy and critical raw materials.
What Lies Ahead?
As the U.S. renews its focus on Greenland, the island’s strategic importance is becoming increasingly clear. For Trump, Greenland aligns with his broader “America First” agenda, which Rep. Michael Waltz described as a modern-day “Monroe Doctrine 2.0.”
For Greenland, the challenge lies in balancing international interest with its aspirations for independence and sustainable development. Closer ties with the U.S. and Europe could bring significant investment, but the island’s leaders remain firm in their stance: Greenland is not for sale.
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
↔ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
→ 
